Monday, 31 March 2014

Multimedia and Multiliteracies in the Primary School - Part 2

Informal Blog Task: Multimedia and Multiliteracies in the Primary School: Linking Theory and Practice (Part 2)

Upon returning to Shirley Warren we were eager to meet the year 1 children and commence work on our talking book relating to article 29 of The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNICEF, 1989). The concept of a talking book related to our experimentation with various apps in week 8 and allowed us to build on and expand our expertise.

I valued this opportunity to immerse myself in all that the iPads have to offer, particularly the apps of iMovie, Book Creator and Veescope. This links with a promise made by Apple (2014) that ‘powerful creative tools, interactive textbooks and a universe of apps and content make endless learning possibilities’. It also goes to satisfy the aims of the new National Curriculum (DfE, 2013) for children to engage in a variety of technology and media across the curriculum as even the one resource of iPads had multiple purposes.

As John and Sutherland (2004) express, ICT is a growing part of children's everyday lives, yet is was still a pleasant surprise to see just how well such young children responded to the features of new apps and technology. However, an important consideration may be whether children fully comprehend how to use the apps when given a specific purpose, or rather is their confidence misleading? Hague & Payton (2010) highlight how many teachers often report that a majority of young people are not as knowledgeable and as technologically savvy as they can appear. This may be true to an extent during our work at Shirley Warren as our group recognised aspects of the apps and were eager  to experiment, yet on more than one occasion would click on a link and unintentionally lose their recordings. The fact that the children remained enthusiastic with the task and were willing to learn demonstrates how the use of technology within the classroom offers a range of opportunities for fun learning and development for children (Byron Review, 2008).

Despite this, the key to our success was collaboration as adults and children helped each other and turned potential hiccups into problem-solving opportunities applying higher-order thinking. Children responded well to having a degree of freedom which was in fact very useful as we could occupy all of the five children by giving them their own task to be getting on with.  Heinrich (2012) supports this, suggesting that iPads and other forms of digital media are a valuable resource due to do their increasing flexibility with applications that encourage children to employ skills that printed texts may not. The lack of time prevented us, however from placing as much of the decision-making in the children’s hands as I would have liked to, yet a longer session could help to overcome this in future practice. Also, regarding the time frame, I would have liked to use the I Can Animate software, but will now look forward to trying that next time!

As an English specialist, I enjoyed the chance to see digitall literacy in action and aimed to reinforce literacy so that ICT is seen as a cross curricula resource (Potter and Darbyshire, 2010). This is even more true as the session incorporated children PSHE, ICT and literacy learning in an active context. This links to Medwell, Moore, Wray and Griffiths’ (2012) belief that ICT should support children’s learning across all subjects where possible.

The visit provided a supportive context as the way in which children were permitted to behave differentiated from some more formal tasks. The challenge of producing a talking book in a limited space of time provided incentive for both adults and children so that they could accomplish their learning while talking, laughing and working collaboratively (Cook & Finlayson, 1999). As well as problem solving, this creative opportunity also allowed for higher order thinking according to Cennamo, Ross and Ertmer (2013: 55) as we as teachers placed the challenge into a relevant context.

From a trainee teacher's perspective, I recognise that the extent to which the school has welcomed new technology remains rare, yet I also feel that it is a natural step that many schools are beginning to take. Children need to be taught at school about technology and how to use it, not only for pleasure at home, but also for educational purposes (Bazelgette, 2010). This may be extended to my own practice and expertise regarding new technology. I plan to always familiarise myself fully with any new technology or specific app before carrying out a lesson, allowing me to plan for the best learning opportunities for that lesson. Brooks-Young (2007:34) suggests the importance of feeling prepared to use technology in the classroom and the positive effect it can have on teaching, ‘as your level of confidence with technology grows, your ability to make adjustments in technology use will also increase’. It would be a shame to miss out on the potential for engaging and memorable learning that interactive technology facilitates (BBC Active, 2010).


References

Bazelgette, C. (2010) Teaching Media in Primary Schools, London: Sage
Heinrich, P. (2012) The iPad as a Tool for Education: A study of the introduction of iPads, Winchester: Naace.
BBC Active. (2010). Ipads in the Classroom. Retrieved from: <http://www.bbcactive.com/BBCActiveIdeasandResources/iPadsintheClassroom.aspx> [Accessed 25/03/2014]
Brooks-Young, S. (2007) Digital-Age Literacy for Teachers: Applying Technology Standards to Everyday Practice Washington: ISTE Publications
Byron Review (2008) Safer Children in a Digital World. DCSF Publications.
Cennamo, K., Ross, J. and Ertmer, P. (2013) Technology Integration for Meaningful Classroom Use: A Standards-Based Approach. Second Edition. California: Wadsworth.
Cook, D. & Finlayson, H. (1999) Interactive Children, Communicative Teaching: ICT and classroom teaching , OUP,  Buckingham
DFE/QCA (2013) The National Curriculum in England, DFE/QCA
UNICEF (1989) The United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child, London: UNICEF UK.
Heinrich, P. (2012) The iPad as a Tool for Education: A study of the introduction of iPads, Winchester: Naace.
John, P and Sutherland, R (2004) Teaching and Learning with ICT: New technology, new pedagogy? Education, Communication and Information, 4, pp101-107
Potter, F. And Darbyshire, C. (2010) Understanding and teaching the ICT National Curriculum. Oxon: Routledge.

3 comments:

  1. I agree that it was an enjoyable experience which made me more aware of how to implement ICT into the literacy curriculum. I also agree that sometimes children may not seem as confident as they appear to be when using technologies and this has also been explored in my blog post. It was apparent that the children were keen to use the iPads however they were not as competent at using it as they seemed. Despite this though, their willingness and enthusiasm to use the iPads and explore them demonstrated that they are 'digital natives' as it only took a short time for them to understand how to use the Apps.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your comment. Viewing the results of our time at Shirley Warren on our final visit today, demonstrates the native skill that even year 1 children possess, in part as a result of the immersion of technology in their popular culture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From discussions today in school in relation to children's skills in ICT, I think it is important for teachers to pitch children's ICT learning experiences at an appropriate level. When I was working with the children I was very keen to help and support them as much as I could, however, some of the children did not need as much help as I thought, therefore, it is important to know the abilities of the children you are working with and promote freedom and independence.

    ReplyDelete