Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Blog 6: Why should teachers care about digital literacy and childhood in the digital age?


This blog focuses on the text ‘Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives’ written by Palfrey and Gasser (2008).
 
It is noted by Marsh, J., Brooks, G., Hughes, J., Ritchie, L., Roberts, S. and Wright, K. (2005) that children are growing up in a technological world and are developing a wide range of skills, knowledge and understanding of this world from birth. Palfrey and Gasser (2008) identify these children as ‘Digital Natives’ as they have grown up in a digital world thus have the computer skills and knowledge to use and access a wide range of technologies. This is supported by research which indicates that even children between the ages of 3 and 4 are using a range of different media devices, ‘including over a third who are going online using a desktop PC, laptop or netbook and 6% who are going online via a tablet computer’ (Ofcom, 2012: 2). Therefore this demonstrates the importance of teachers taking into account ‘childhood in the digital age’ as children are coming into the classroom with already well developed experience of technology (Dean, 2010).
 
Within the text, Palfrey and Gasser (2008) explore the differences between ‘Digital Natives’ who have the ability to multitask with digital technologies and ‘Digital Immigrants’ who are less familiar with technological environments. Furthermore, they highlight the importance of enabling ‘Digital Natives’ to explore and access different technologies as society can often ‘fail to harness the good that can come from these opportunities’ (Palfrey and Gasser, 2008: 9). The Byron Review (2008) furthers this point by stating that the focus should move away from the belief that digital media causes ‘harm’ and instead should focus on what children bring to technology in order to empower  them to manage risks and make the digital world safer. Research has indicated that the impact of digital technologies on learning has a positive effect on the motivation and engagement of children (Higgins, Xiao and Katsipataki, 2012; Marsh et al., 2005).
 
However, Prensky (2001) argues that educators often ignore the many skills that new technologies have enhanced in ‘Digital Natives’ which have profound implications for their learning. Palfrey and Gasser (2008) acknowledge this as they state that teachers often worry that the skills they have imparted over time are becoming either lost or out-dated as they are ‘out of step’ with the ‘Digital Natives’ they are teaching. Although children are confident with the technology, ‘they are still developing critical evaluation skills and need help to make wise decisions’ (Byron Review, 2008: 2), therefore teachers need opportunities to explore and discover digital literacies for themselves in order to build the confidence to use them in the classroom (Dean, 2010; Marsh et al., 2005). However, Higgins et al. (2012) argue that although digital technology engages and motivates young people, it is only an advantage for learning if the activity is effectively aligned with what is to be learned. Therefore, teachers cannot make the assumption that using different forms of digital media will have a positive impact on children’s learning unless it is used appropriately and effectively.
 
Palfrey and Gasser (2008) also identify the ‘fear’ associated with young children using technology as there is a high risk of being exposed to inappropriate or ‘harmful’ material. The internet allows for global exploration which can bring risks (Byron Review, 2008) however Ofcom (2012) argue that parents are taking some sort of action to intervene with their children’s media use. Experience of working in an educational setting has given me the opportunity to observe how teachers prevent children from viewing inappropriate content online. Whilst working in school, I supervised children who were using the internet for research to ensure they did not come across anything unsuitable. This experience also enabled me to understand why Palfrey and Gasser (2008) would refer to these children as ‘Digital Natives’ as they were independently able to log onto the laptops and use the internet with no teacher input or support.
Therefore it is important that teachers foster children’s ability to use technology and ensure that children engage with a wide range of media and technologies to develop ‘media literacy’ (Marsh et al., 2005). Children are growing up in a digitally literate world where they are exposed to a vast range of technologies, therefore teachers need to adapt their teaching to meet the needs of ‘Digital Natives’ in order to develop their learning through digital technology.
 
Byron Review (2008) Safer Children in a Digital World. DCSF Publications.
 
Dean, G. 'Rethinking Literacy' in Bazalgette, C. (ed) (2010) Teaching Media in Primary Classrooms. London: SAGE
 
Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., and Katsipataki, M. (2012) The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Durham University: Education Endowment Foundation.
 
Marsh, J., Brooks, G., Hughes, J., Ritchie, L., Roberts, S. and Wright, K. (2005) Digital beginnings: Young children’s use of popular culture, media and new technologies. Sheffield: Literacy Research Centre.
 
Ofcom (2012) Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. London
 
Palfrey, J. and Gasser, U. (2008) Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books
 
Prensky, M. (2001) ‘Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part II: Do They Really Think Differently?’ On the Horizon. NCB University Press, Vol. 9: 6.
 

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with the points raised in your blog post and some of the ideas of Palmer (2006) found in my post can support these. However, Palmer does also offer some more contradictory points to the use of digital literacy. These issues can be found in my post.

    I agreed with what you read about the fear of children viewing inappropriate material whilst using technology; this was also seen as an issue by Palmer (2006). However, this could be approached through the teaching of E-safety in digital literacy lessons so children understand what they should and should not be doing with technology, such as the internet, and what to do if they do come across inappropriate material.

    Palmer also identified that there should be an 'off-switch' for technology and even though, as you found, technology is a major part in childhood it should not be the only part. This shows that teachers need to find an appropriate balance between digital literacy and 'traditional' teaching.

    Palmer, S. (2006) Toxic Childhood: How the Modern World is Damaging Our Children and What We Can Do About it. London: Orion Books. Chapter 9.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that technology should not dominate the curriculum as 'traditional' teaching is just as important as using various modes of technology. I also agree that teachers should find an appropriate balance as they need to incorporate technology into their teaching and not make it a seperate aspect of learning.

      Delete
  3. The fact that children as young as 3 and 4 have ready access to the internet according to Palfrey and Gasser (2008) makes it all the more important for parents to monitor what their children have access to. This is a consistent issue highlighted by Palmer (2006) but also my reading this week, Papadopoulos (2010). However, Papadopoulos (2010) does note the chllenges of this in the increasingly digital world that children are born into. I find the role of the parent of particular interest as they strive to find the balance between e-safety and positive use of technology.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Palmer (2006) can be used to support your view of parents as she also addresses how it is the parents responsibility to know what their children are doing with technology and suggest that a way to tackle the issues of E-Safety is to bring computers and televisions back into communal areas of the household, such as the family room.

      Delete
    2. I agree that the role of the parent is particularly important as it is the parents who enable their children to have access to the internet outside of school. During school experience I spoke to many parents who explained to me that their child used the internet for a range of purposes for example research for home learning. Therefore, parents who allow their children to access the internet, need to ensure that their children are aware of the importance of internet access and safety in order for the children to use the internet appropriately.

      Delete